SAFETY · 2026-05-20 · ~11-min read

Retrofitting Safety on Automotive Stamping and Press Lines — Light Curtain Selection, Response Time, and Throughput

A press is the most unforgiving machine on most factory floors. Retrofitting one for modern guarding is not hard — but it is easy to do in a way that looks compliant and is not. Here is the order to do it in.

Safety light curtain retrofitted to an industrial stamping press
A light curtain at the point of operation — the visible part of a press retrofit, and not the hard part.

Here is a scenario we have seen more than once. A plant buys a good Type 4 light curtain for an aging mechanical press, mounts it neatly across the point of operation, wires it through a safety relay, and considers the press “done.” It looks right. It photographs well. And it is not safe — because nobody measured how long that particular press actually takes to stop, and the curtain is mounted closer than the real stopping time allows.

Presses cause some of the most severe injuries in manufacturing: amputations, crush injuries, the kind of incident that ends careers. They also tend to be old — a stamping press can run for forty years — which means guarding them is usually a retrofit, not a clean-sheet design. This article is the retrofit checklist we walk through with engineers, in the order the work should actually happen.

Step 1 — Risk assessment, before you buy anything

The temptation on a retrofit is to skip straight to ordering a light curtain. Resist it. The risk assessment decides what kind of protection the press needs, what body parts are exposed, from which directions, during which part of the stroke, and how many people are at risk. Those answers drive every later choice — resolution, mounting, whether muting is needed, whether two-hand control should be retained. Buy hardware before the assessment and you will usually buy the wrong hardware.

Step 2 — Choose resolution from the hazard, not the catalogue

Light curtain resolution is the smallest object the curtain is guaranteed to detect. For press work the practical bands are:

ResolutionDetectsTypical press use
14 mmFingerHand-fed stamping where fingers can enter the die area
20-30 mmHand / wristPoint-of-operation where exposure is hand, not finger
40 mm+Limb / bodyAccess detection at a guarded perimeter, usually muted for feed

For a press where the operator hand-feeds blanks and fingers can reach the die, 14 mm finger detection is the safe default. A common error is choosing a coarser resolution because it is cheaper or because the curtain can then sit further back — but resolution is a safety parameter, not a budget lever. It is set by the hazard. Whichever resolution you choose, it feeds directly into the next step, because resolution changes the minimum distance.

Step 3 — Measure the real stopping time

This is the step that gets skipped, and skipping it is what makes a tidy installation unsafe. The ISO 13855 safety distance depends on how long the whole machine takes to stop after the curtain trips — the overall system stopping performance. On an old press, that number is not on any datasheet, and even if it were, it would describe the press when it was new.

Brakes wear. Clutches slip. Hydraulic valves slow down. A press that stopped in 250 ms in 1998 may take 350 ms today. So a retrofit must include a measurement of the actual stopping time on the actual machine, in its current condition, with a stop-time measuring instrument. Measure it with the press warm and under representative conditions, and use the measured value — with margin — in the calculation, never an assumed one.

Step 4 — Calculate the safety distance (ISO 13855)

With resolution and stopping time in hand, the ISO 13855 minimum distance follows from the familiar relationship S = K × T + C: the approach speed K, the total time T (machine stopping time plus the curtain's own response time), and an intrusion-distance term C that depends on resolution. Mount the curtain any closer than S and a hand can reach the die before the ram stops — that is the failure mode this whole exercise exists to prevent.

We will not reproduce the full method here because we already have a dedicated guide; if you are doing this calculation, work through our ISO 13855 safety-distance guide alongside this article. The one point to carry over: the T in that formula is the measured stopping time from Step 3, not a hopeful estimate.

Light curtain guarding the feed area of a press, stopping the ram before hands reach the danger zone
The curtain has to sit at least the ISO 13855 distance back from the die — calculated, not estimated.

Step 5 — Monitor the stopping performance over time

Here is the uncomfortable truth about Step 3: you measured the stopping time on one day, and the press will not honour that number forever. The brake that gave you 280 ms this month will drift. And a light curtain installation, on its own, has no way of knowing.

That is what a stopping-performance monitor — often called a brake monitor — is for. It checks, cycle after cycle, that the press still stops within the time the safety distance assumed, and faults the press out before a degraded stop becomes a hazard. On a mechanical power press with a friction brake, treat it as essential. A light curtain without stopping-performance monitoring on such a press is a safety distance with an expiry date nobody is watching.

Step 6 — Handle the material feed without opening a hole

A press that is fed by a conveyor or a coil line has material crossing the curtain plane every cycle. If every passing blank tripped the curtain, the press could not run. The answer is muting — temporarily and automatically suspending the protective function while material, and only material, passes.

Muting is safe when it is designed so that the muting sensors can only be satisfied by the product, not by a person — correct sensor count, correct geometry, and a time limit on how long the mute can stay active. Muting is dangerous when it is set up loosely enough that an operator can walk through alongside the load. It is also frequently confused with blanking, which is a different function entirely. Before you design a feed pass-through, read our explainer on muting vs blanking.

A word on PSDI — and why we advise against it

Sooner or later someone on a press retrofit asks about PSDI — presence-sensing device initiation — using the light curtain itself to restart the press cycle the moment the operator withdraws their hands, with no separate start button. The appeal is obvious: it shaves a second or two off every cycle.

Our advice is to leave it alone on a retrofit unless a qualified safety engineer specifically designs and signs it off. PSDI is tightly restricted — permitted only on certain press types, heavily regulated, and dependent on the press being in excellent mechanical condition. It also removes a deliberate human action from the cycle, which removes a margin for error. On a machine that amputates, that margin is worth more than the throughput. The honest cost-benefit on most older presses does not favour PSDI.

The standards, briefly

A press retrofit answers to several standards at once: ISO 16092 for press safety specifically (with parts for mechanical, hydraulic and pneumatic presses), ISO 13855 for positioning the protective device, IEC 61496 for the light curtain as electro-sensitive protective equipment (Type 4 on a press), and ISO 13849-1 or IEC 62061 for the reliability — the Performance Level or SIL — of the complete stop function. Regional power-press regulations apply on top. Satisfy the set, not a favourite member of it.

Throughput — the part everyone actually worries about

Operator retrieving a part from a press protected by a light curtain
Done well, a light curtain retrofit improves cycle time — the operator loads and unloads faster than with a hard guard.

The unspoken fear behind most press retrofits is that safety will cost cycle time. In practice a well-designed light curtain retrofit often improves throughput compared with the fixed gate or interlocked guard it replaces, because the operator can load and unload with free hand movement instead of opening and closing a physical barrier. The places throughput genuinely suffers are the avoidable ones: nuisance trips from poor optical interference immunity, and a curtain mounted needlessly far back because the stopping time was never measured and a worst-case guess was used instead. Both are fixed by doing the steps above properly, not by cutting corners on safety.

Where DAIDISIKE fits

For completeness: DAIDISIKE has supplied press guarding for two decades, and stamping-press peripherals are part of our core business. The DQS press photoelectric safety guard is built specifically for point-of-operation hand protection on presses; the DQE and DQA Type 4 families cover finger and hand resolutions; and the DA31 safety relay handles the OSSD evaluation and EDM feedback. What we cannot ship in a box is the stopping-time measurement and the safety distance — those are site work, and they are the part that actually keeps the operator's hands attached. If you are planning a retrofit, our engineering team can help scope it properly.

The bottom line

The light curtain is the easy, visible part of a press retrofit. The retrofit succeeds or fails on the parts that do not photograph well: a real risk assessment, a measured stopping time, a correctly calculated ISO 13855 distance, and a stopping-performance monitor watching the brake for the next twenty years. Do those, choose resolution from the hazard, be careful with muting, and stay away from PSDI unless an expert owns it — and an old press becomes a genuinely safe machine that also runs faster than it did behind a hard guard.

Related reading

ISO 13855 Safety Distance — Practical Guide

The S = K × T + C calculation, with T as your measured stopping time.

Muting vs Blanking

Get the feed pass-through wrong and you build a hole in the guard.

Performance Level (PL) vs SIL Explained

The reliability rating the full press stop function must meet.

DAIDISIKE DQS Press Safety Guard

Point-of-operation hand protection built for power presses.

Pneumatic Air Feeders in Punch Press Automation

Automating the feed that your muting design has to account for.

DAIDISIKE DQE Series

Type 4 light curtain with finger and hand resolution options.

Frequently asked questions

What resolution light curtain should I use on a power press?

It depends on what body part can reach the hazard and from where. If an operator's fingers can enter the die area, you need 14 mm finger-detection resolution. If the exposure is hand and wrist, 20-30 mm hand detection is typical. Where the curtain only has to detect a whole person passing through an access point and there is no reach-through risk, 30-40 mm body or access detection is used, normally with muting for the material feed. On most stamping presses where the operator hand-feeds blanks, 14 mm at the point of operation is the safe default. The finer the resolution, the closer to the hazard the curtain detects — but finer resolution also forces a mounting position dictated by the ISO 13855 calculation, so resolution and safety distance have to be chosen together.

Why do I have to measure the press stopping time instead of using the datasheet value?

Because the datasheet value, if it exists at all for an older press, describes the machine when it was new. The overall system stopping performance — often called the stop time or T_stop — depends on the brake, the clutch, the valves, hydraulic condition, wear, and temperature, all of which drift over years of service. The ISO 13855 safety distance is calculated from the actual measured stopping time, so a retrofit must include a stopping-performance measurement on the real machine, in its current condition, using a stop-time measuring instrument. Using an optimistic datasheet figure produces a safety distance that is too short, which means a hand can reach the die before the ram stops. Measure it.

What is a brake monitor and do I need one?

A brake monitor — or more generally a stopping-performance monitor — continuously checks that the press still stops within the time the safety distance assumed. A press is a machine whose stopping time degrades: brakes wear, clutches slip, hydraulics age. A light curtain mounted at a distance calculated for a 250 ms stop becomes unsafe the day the press starts taking 320 ms, and nothing in a plain light curtain installation would catch that. A stopping-performance monitor does, by faulting the press out before the degraded stop becomes a hazard. On a mechanical power press with a friction brake it should be considered essential, not optional.

Can I use a light curtain to cycle the press automatically (PSDI)?

PSDI — presence-sensing device initiation — means using the light curtain itself to restart the press cycle when the operator withdraws their hands, with no separate start control. It is technically possible and it is genuinely tempting for throughput, but our firm advice is to avoid it on a retrofit unless a qualified safety engineer specifically designs and signs it off. PSDI is tightly restricted: it is only permitted on certain press types, it is heavily regulated, and it removes a deliberate human action from the cycle, which narrows the margin for error. The throughput gain is real but small, and the consequences of getting it wrong on a press are catastrophic. Treat PSDI as an expert-only option, not a default.

Which standards govern power press guarding?

Several work together. ISO 16092 is the machine-specific safety standard for presses, with parts covering mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic and other press types. ISO 13855 governs the positioning of the protective device — the safety distance calculation. IEC 61496 defines the light curtain itself as electro-sensitive protective equipment, and Type 4 is the level used on presses. ISO 13849-1 or IEC 62061 governs the functional-safety reliability — the Performance Level or SIL — of the complete stop function. Regional regulations such as the relevant national power-press regulations also apply. A compliant retrofit satisfies the whole set.

Is a light curtain always the right choice for a press, or are two-hand controls better?

They solve different problems and are often used together. A two-hand control guarantees the operator's hands are both occupied and clear of the die during the dangerous part of the stroke — but it protects only that operator, not a second worker, and it does nothing once the hands are released. A light curtain protects anyone who enters the detection field and allows freer hand movement for loading and unloading, which usually helps throughput. On many presses the best answer is a light curtain at the point of operation for general protection, with two-hand control retained where a specific operation needs it. The risk assessment decides; the two are not rivals so much as complementary tools.

About DAIDISIKE: Foshan-based industrial safety sensor manufacturer since 2006, with two decades of power-press guarding experience. The DQS, DQE, DQA, DQC, DQO, MK and JER safety light curtain families and stamping-press peripherals ship to OEMs including BYD, Huawei, Midea, Foxconn, Amphenol and Samsung Electronics. Talk to our engineering team: contact us or browse the full DAIDISIKE safety light curtain family.

inXfrWA✉︎PTG

Leave your message